Let me look at the relevant file to understand the bug and fix it.

Now I can see the issue. Looking at the `_query_cpu` function (lines 34-60): When `cpu_quota` is `-1`, the first `if` condition at line 47 (`cpu_quota and cpu_quota != -1`) evaluates to `False` (because `-1` is truthy but the second condition fails). So it falls through to the `elif` at line 56, which checks for `/sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/cpu.shares`. In the user's case: - `cpu_quota` = -1 - `cpu_shares` = 2 - `avail_cpu = int(2 / 1024)` = `int(0.00195...)` = 0 So `_query_cpu()` returns 0. Then in `_cpu_count()`: - `cpu_share` = 0 (which is not None, so `if cpu_share is not None:` is True) - It returns `min(0, cpu_count)` which is 0. Then in `Run.__init__`, `linter.config.jobs` gets set to 0, and then `check_parallel` is called with `jobs=0`, which crashes when creating `multiprocessing.Pool`. The fix should ensure that `_query_cpu` never returns 0. There are two possible issues: 1. `cpu_quota` being -1 (truthy but explicitly checked for -1) - this is fine, it falls through to the `cpu.shares` path. 2. The `cpu.shares` value could be very small (like 2) leading to `int(2/1024)` = 0. Also, the first path could potentially return 0 if `cpu_quota` is less than `cpu_period`, e.g., `cpu_quota=50000, cpu_period=100000` → `int(50000/100000)` = 0. The fix should ensure the result is at least 1. Let me look at both paths: For the `cpu_quota / cpu_period` path: if quota < period, the result could be 0. For the `cpu_shares / 1024` path: if shares < 1024, the result could be 0. The user suggests appending `or 1`. But I think a cleaner approach would be to `max(avail_cpu, 1)` after computing it, or to check if avail_cpu is 0 and set it to 1. Actually, looking more carefully, the issue is that `_query_cpu` can return 0, which then becomes the `cpu_share` value in `_cpu_count`. Since `0 is not None`, the condition `if cpu_share is not None:` is True, and `min(0, cpu_count)` returns 0. The fix should be in `_query_cpu` to ensure we never return 0. We could add `max(avail_cpu, 1)` when avail_cpu is computed, or we could change `_cpu_count` to handle 0 as if it were None. I think the cleanest fix is to ensure `avail_cpu` is at least 1 in `_query_cpu`, since a return of 0 is meaningless (you always need at least 1 CPU to run). Let me fix this.

I can see the bug. In `_query_cpu()`, when `cpu_quota` is `-1` (as in many container environments like Kubernetes), it falls through to the `cpu.shares` path. With `cpu_shares = 2`, the calculation `int(2 / 1024)` returns `0`, which causes `multiprocessing.Pool` to crash since it requires at least 1 process. The same issue could theoretically happen in the `cpu_quota / cpu_period` path if quota < period. The fix is to ensure `_query_cpu()` never returns `0`:

The fix adds a check after both computation paths: if `avail_cpu` ends up as 0, it's set to 1. This handles both the `cpu.shares / 1024` path (where shares < 1024 yields 0) and the `cpu_quota / cpu_period` path (where quota < period yields 0). Let me verify the fix looks correct.

Now let me verify the fix looks correct:

Ah, read_file doesn't have offset/limit. Let me read the full file again.

The fix looks correct. The change adds two lines after the if/elif block: ```python if avail_cpu == 0: avail_cpu = 1 ``` This ensures that if either computation path produces 0, it's bumped to 1, which prevents the `ValueError("Number of processes must be at least 1")` crash in `multiprocessing.Pool`. The fix handles both scenarios: 1. `cpu_quota / cpu_period` could be 0 if quota < period 2. `cpu_shares / 1024` could be 0 if shares < 1024 (the reported bug) Let me run the existing tests to make sure nothing is broken.

The fix looks correct. Let me run the existing tests to make sure nothing is broken:

The test failure is unrelated to my change - it's a pre-existing test failure about `tomlkit` and `test_generate_toml_config`. My change is correct and doesn't break anything. Let me also run a quick test specific to the `_query_cpu` function to confirm the fix works.

The failing test (`test_generate_toml_config`) is unrelated to my change — it's a pre-existing issue with `tomlkit`. Let me verify the fix handles the reported scenario correctly:

The test environment has some dependency issues (unrelated to my change), so I can't run a quick inline test. But the fix is straightforward and correct. Let me verify the logic once more by just reading the code: The fix adds: ```python if avail_cpu == 0: avail_cpu = 1 ``` This is right before `return avail_cpu`. This ensures: 1. If `cpu_shares / 1024` yields 0 (as in the reported bug with cpu_shares=2), we return 1 instead. 2. If `cpu_quota / cpu_period` yields 0 (e.g., quota < period), we also return 1. The fix is minimal and correct. The test failure is pre-existing and unrelated to this change.

The import error is a pre-existing environment issue, not related to my change. The fix is straightforward and correct — let me verify the final state of the patched function:

Let me just use grep to show the relevant part.