Leaderboard  /  astropy-14995

astropy__astropy-14995

astropy/astropy · v5.2  ·  6 steps · 51,772 tokens · 168s
resolved
1.00

The task

The bug report the agent was given — plus the gold fix and hidden tests, shown here for reference. The agent saw only the problem statement.

Problem statementgithub issue
In v5.3, NDDataRef mask propagation fails when one of the operand does not have a mask
### Description

This applies to v5.3. 

It looks like when one of the operand does not have a mask, the mask propagation when doing arithmetic, in particular with `handle_mask=np.bitwise_or` fails.  This is not a problem in v5.2.

I don't know enough about how all that works, but it seems from the error that the operand without a mask is set as a mask of None's and then the bitwise_or tries to operate on an integer and a None and fails.

### Expected behavior

When one of the operand does not have mask, the mask that exists should just be copied over to the output.  Or whatever was done in that situat …
Gold patchheld back · the reference fix
diff --git a/astropy/nddata/mixins/ndarithmetic.py b/astropy/nddata/mixins/ndarithmetic.py--- a/astropy/nddata/mixins/ndarithmetic.py+++ b/astropy/nddata/mixins/ndarithmetic.py@@ -520,10 +520,10 @@ def _arithmetic_mask(self, operation, operand, handle_mask, axis=None, **kwds): elif self.mask is None and operand is not None: # Make a copy so there is no reference in the result. return deepcopy(operand.mask)- elif operand is None:+ elif operand.mask is None: return deepcopy(self.mask) else:- # Now lets calculate the resulting mask (operation enforces copy)+ # Now let's calculate the resulting mask (operation enforces copy) return handle_mask(self.mask, operand.mask, **kwds) def _arithmetic_wcs(self, operation, operand, compare_wcs, **kwds):
Hidden testtest_patch · applied only to grade
diff --git a/astropy/nddata/mixins/tests/test_ndarithmetic.py b/astropy/nddata/mixins/tests/test_ndarithmetic.py--- a/astropy/nddata/mixins/tests/test_ndarithmetic.py+++ b/astropy/nddata/mixins/tests/test_ndarithmetic.py@@ -1310,3 +1310,42 @@ def test_raise_method_not_supported(): # raise error for unsupported propagation operations: with pytest.raises(ValueError): ndd1.uncertainty.propagate(np.mod, ndd2, result, correlation)+++def test_nddata_bitmask_arithmetic():+ # NDData.mask is usually assumed to be boolean, but could be+ # a bitmask. Ensure bitmask works:+ array = np.array([[0, 1, 0], [1, 0, 1], [0, 1, 0]])+ mask = np.array([[0, 1, 64], [8, 0, 1], [2, 1, 0]])++ nref_nomask = NDDataRef(array)+ nref_masked = NDDataRef(array, mask=mask)++ # multiply no mask by constant (no mask * no mask)+ assert nref_nomask.multiply(1.0, handle_mask=np.bitwise_or).mask is None++ # multiply no mask by itself (no mask * no mask)+ assert nref_nomask.multiply(nref_nomask, handle_mask=np.bitwise_or).mask is None++ # multiply masked by constant (mask * no mask)+ np.testing.assert_equal(+ nref_masked.multiply(1.0, handle_mask=np.bitwise_or).mask, mask+ )++ # multiply masked by itself (mask * mask)+ np.testing.assert_equal(+ nref_masked.multiply(nref_masked, handle_mask=np.bitwise_or).mask, mask+ )++ # multiply masked by no mask (mask * no mask)+ np.testing.assert_equal(+ nref_masked.multiply(nref_nomask, handle_mask=np.bitwise_or).mask, mask+ )++ # check bitwise logic still works+ other_mask = np.array([[64, 1, 0], [2, 1, 0], [8, 0, 2]])+ nref_mask_other = NDDataRef(array, mask=other_mask)+ np.testing.assert_equal(+ nref_mask_other.multiply(nref_masked, handle_mask=np.bitwise_or).mask,+ np.bitwise_or(mask, other_mask),+ )
1FAIL → PASS
179PASS → PASS
180 / 180green

The agent run

The agent's step-by-step attempt — its reasoning, the tools it called, and the patch it produced.

System promptharness.agent.build_system_prompt
You are an AI coding assistant working inside a code repository that contains a bug. Investigate the code, find the bug, and fix it.

Your working directory is: /testbed
All four tools (read_file, write_file, edit_file, run_bash) already run from that directory. Use plain relative paths; do not prefix shell commands with cd. Fix the bug by editing source files only; do not create or edit test files.
Step 01 tool use
Let me understand the bug: 1. In v5.3, `NDDataRef` mask propagation fails when one operand doesn't have a mask and `handle_mask=np.bitwise_or` is used. 2. The error is `TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for |: 'int' and 'NoneType'` 3. This suggests that when one operand lacks a mask, it's being treated as `None` somewhere, and then `bitwise_or` tries to operate on `int | None`. Let me look at the relevant code in the astropy codebase.
run_bash{ command: "find /testbed -type f -name \"*.py\" | xargs grep -l \"NDDataRef\\|handle_mask\\|bitwise_or\" 2>/dev/null" }
tool result · run_bash
exitcode: 0 stdout: /testbed/astropy/units/quantity_helper/helpers.py /testbed/astropy/nddata/nddata_withmixins.py /testbed/astropy/nddata/mixins/tests/test_ndarithmetic.py /testbed/astropy/nddata/mixins/tests/test_ndslicing.py /testbed/astropy/nddata/mixins/tests/test_ndio.py /testbed/astropy/nddata/mixins/ndslicing.py /testbed/astropy/nddata/mixins/ndarithmetic.py /testbed/astropy/nddata/nddata.py stderr:
Step 02 tool use
Let me look at the key file: ndarithmetic.py
read_file{ path: "/testbed/astropy/nddata/mixins/ndarithmetic.py" }
tool result · read_file
# Licensed under a 3-clause BSD style license - see LICENSE.rst # This module implements the Arithmetic mixin to the NDData class. import warnings from copy import deepcopy import numpy as np from astropy.nddata.nduncertainty import NDUncertainty from astropy.units import dimensionless_unscaled from astropy.utils import format_doc, sharedmethod from astropy.utils.exceptions import AstropyUserWarning from astropy.utils.masked import Masked __all__ = ["NDArithmeticMixin"] …
Step 03 tool use
Now I can see the issue. Let me trace through the code when we have `nref_mask.multiply(1., handle_mask=np.bitwise_or)`: 1. `multiply` is called on `nref_mask` (which has a mask) with `operand=1.0` 2. This calls `_prepare_then_do_arithmetic(np.multiply, 1., None, handle_mask=np.bitwise_or)` 3. Since `self_or_cls` is an instance of NDArithmeticMixin, it goes into the first branch 4. `operand2` is None, so `operand2 = operand` (1.0) and `operand = self_or_cls` (nref_mask) 5. Then `operand2` is not a subclass of NDArithmeticMixin, so `operand2 = cls(operand2)` which converts 1.0 to an NDDataRef 6. Then `result, init_kwds = operand._arithmetic(operation, operand2, **kwargs)` is called Now in `_arithmetic`: - `operand` is now the NDDataRef created from 1.0 (no mask) - `self` is the nref_mask (has a mask) - `handle_mask=np.bitwise_or` Let's look at the mask handling logic: ```python if handle_mask is None: pass elif hasattr(result, "mask"): # if numpy.ma or astropy.utils.masked is being used, the constructor # will pick up the mask from the masked object: kwargs["mask"] = None elif handle_mask in ["ff", "first_found"]: if self.mask is None: kwargs["mask"] = deepcopy(operand.mask) else: kwargs["mask"] = deepcopy(self.mask) else: kwargs["mask"] = self._arithmetic_mask( operation, operand, handle_mask, axis=axis, **kwds2["mask"] ) ``` So since `handle_mask=np.bitwise_or` (not None, not "ff"/"first_found"), it goes to `_arithmetic_mask`. In `_arithmetic_mask`: ```python def _arithmetic_mask(self, operation, operand, handle_mask, axis=None, **kwds): # If only one mask is present we need not bother about any type checks if ( self.mask is None and operand is not None and operand.mask is None ) or handle_mask is None: return None elif self.mask is None and operand is not None: # Make a copy so there is no reference in the result. return deepcopy(operand.mask) elif operand is None: return deepcopy(self.mask) else: # Now lets calculate the resulting mask (operation enforces copy) return handle_mask(self.mask, operand.mask, **kwds) ``` Wait, let me check. `self` is the nref_mask (has mask), `operand` is the NDDataRef from 1.0 (no mask). The first condition: `self.mask is None and operand is not None and operand.mask is None` - this is False because `self.mask` is not None (it has a mask). Second condition: `self.mask is None and operand is not None` - False. Third condition: `operand is None` - False, operand is not None. So it falls through to `else: return handle_mask(self.mask, operand.mask, **kwds)`. `self.mask` is the actual mask array (numpy array of ints), `operand.mask` is `None` because the NDDataRef created from 1.0 doesn't have a mask. So `np.bitwise_or(mask_array, None)` is called, which gives `TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for |: 'int' and 'NoneType'`. The bug is in `_arithmetic_mask`. The first condition checks `self.mask is None and operand is not None and operand.mask is None` - both are None. But it doesn't check the case where `operand.mask is None` but `self.mask` is not None. The fix should add a condition to handle the case where one operand has a mask and the other doesn't. In that case, the mask from the one that has it should be returned (deepcopy). Let me also check what happens when `self.mask` is None and `operand.mask` is not None - that's covered by `elif self.mask is None and operand is not None`. But when `self.mask` is not None and `operand.mask` is None, it falls through to the else. The fix should be: ```python elif operand is not None and operand.mask is None: return deepcopy(self.mask) ``` Or more elegantly, restructure the conditions: ```python if self.mask is None and (operand is None or operand.mask is None): return None elif self.mask is None: return deepcopy(operand.mask) elif operand is None or operand.mask is None: return ... [truncated 607 characters]
I can see the bug. Let me trace through the code to confirm: In `_arithmetic_mask`, when `self` has a mask but `operand` does not (e.g., multiplying a masked NDDataRef by a scalar), it falls through to `handle_mask(self.mask, operand.mask)` where `operand.mask` is `None`, causing `np.bitwise_or(int, None)` to fail. The missing case is: when `operand` is not `None` but `operand.mask` is `None` (and `self.mask` is not `None`), it should just return a copy of `self.mask`.
edit_file{ path: "/testbed/astropy/nddata/mixins/ndarithmetic.py", old_string: " def _arithmetic_mask(self, operation, operand, handle_mask, axis=None, **kwds):\n \"\"\"\n Calculate the resulting mask.\n\n This is implement…", new_string: " def _arithmetic_mask(self, operation, operand, handle_mask, axis=None, **kwds):\n \"\"\"\n Calculate the resulting mask.\n\n This is implement…" }
tool result · edit_file
File /testbed/astropy/nddata/mixins/ndarithmetic.py edited successfully.
Step 04 tool use
Now let me verify the fix by running the reproduction steps from the bug report:
Let me verify the fix by running the reproduction case from the bug report:
run_bash{ command: "cd /testbed && python -c \"\nimport numpy as np\nfrom astropy.nddata import NDDataRef\n\narray = np.array([[0, 1, 0], [1, 0, 1], [0, 1, 0]])\nmask = np.array([[0, 1, …" }
tool result · run_bash
exitcode: 0 stdout: Test 1: None Test 2: None Test 3: [[ 0 1 64] [ 8 0 1] [ 2 1 0]] Test 4: [[ 0 1 64] [ 8 0 1] [ 2 1 0]] Test 5: [[ 0 1 64] [ 8 0 1] [ 2 1 0]] stderr:
Step 05 tool use
All tests pass. Let me also run the existing test suite for ndarithmetic to make sure nothing is broken.
All five test cases now pass. Let me also run the existing test suite to make sure nothing is broken:
run_bash{ command: "cd /testbed && python -m pytest astropy/nddata/mixins/tests/test_ndarithmetic.py -v 2>&1 | tail -50" }
tool result · run_bash
exitcode: 0 stdout: astropy/nddata/mixins/tests/test_ndarithmetic.py::test_arithmetics_stddevuncertainty_with_units[uncert14-uncert24] PASSED [ 73%] astropy/nddata/mixins/tests/test_ndarithmetic.py::test_arithmetics_stddevuncertainty_with_units[uncert15-uncert25] PASSED [ 74%] astropy/nddata/mixins/tests/test_ndarithmetic.py::test_arithmetics_stddevuncertainty_with_units[uncert16-uncert26] PASSED [ 74%] astropy/nddata/mixi …
Step 06 reasoning
All 179 tests pass. The fix is clean and correct. Let me also quickly verify the exact logic change by looking at the final state of the file:
All 179 tests pass. Here's a summary of the bug and the fix: **Bug**: In `_arithmetic_mask`, when `self` had a mask but `operand` did not (e.g., multiplying a masked `NDDataRef` by a scalar like `1.`), the method fell through to `handle_mask(self.mask, operand.mask)` where `operand.mask` was `None`. This caused `np.bitwise_or(int_array, None)` to raise `TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for |: 'int' and 'NoneType'`. **Fix**: Restructured the conditionals in `_arithmetic_mask` to properly handle all four cases: 1. **Neither has a mask** (or `handle_mask is None`) → return `None` 2. **Only `operand` has a mask** → return `deepcopy(operand.mask)` 3. **Only `self` has a mask** (or `operand is None`) → return `deepcopy(self.mask)` 4. **Both have masks** → apply `handle_mask(self.mask, operand.mask)` The old code was missing case 3 when `operand` was not `None` but `operand.mask` was `None`.
Agent diffcaptured before grading
diff --git a/astropy/nddata/mixins/ndarithmetic.py b/astropy/nddata/mixins/ndarithmetic.pyindex 4153dfccb..6af0b066a 100644--- a/astropy/nddata/mixins/ndarithmetic.py+++ b/astropy/nddata/mixins/ndarithmetic.py@@ -513,14 +513,14 @@ class NDArithmeticMixin: ``handle_mask`` must create (and copy) the returned mask. """ # If only one mask is present we need not bother about any type checks- if (- self.mask is None and operand is not None and operand.mask is None- ) or handle_mask is None:+ if handle_mask is None:+ return None+ elif self.mask is None and (operand is None or operand.mask is None): return None- elif self.mask is None and operand is not None:+ elif self.mask is None: # Make a copy so there is no reference in the result. return deepcopy(operand.mask)- elif operand is None:+ elif operand is None or operand.mask is None: return deepcopy(self.mask) else: # Now lets calculate the resulting mask (operation enforces copy)